🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 269+ reviews
Vintage ✓ In Stock 🔥 Bestseller

Vintage 1986 Designer Laurel Burch “Rainbow Cats” Cloisonné Enamel 18” Necklace

★★★★★ 4.5 out of 5 (269 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$65
$108.33
Sale
✓ gratis shipment on this item • Limited time offer

Vintage 1986 Designer Laurel Burch “Rainbow Cats” Cloisonné Enamel 18” Necklace

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt Shipping
↩️
basic Returns

📋 Product Description

Vintage 1986 Designer Laurel Burch “Rainbow Cats” Cloisonné Enamel 18” Necklace

Vintage 1986 Designer Laurel Burch “Rainbow Cats” Cloisonné Enamel 18” Necklace

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 308758

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Necklaces

Original Price: $108.33 USD

Sale Price: $65 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 shipment & Returns

✓ on the house distribution on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.5
★★★★★
Based on 269 reviews
NP
Nathan Phillips ✓ Verified
1 month ago
★★★★★
fabulous Vintage 1986 Designer Laurel Burch “Rainbow Cats” Cloisonné Enamel 18” Necklace!
Honestly, the Vintage 1986 Designer Laurel Burch “Rainbow Cats” Cloisonné Enamel 18” Necklace works as described and I don’t regret it.​
MR
Matthew Robinson ✓ Verified
1 month ago
★★★★★
terrific Quality
After various use, the Vintage 1986 Designer Laurel Burch “Rainbow Cats” Cloisonné Enamel 18” Necklace does its job so no complaints.
BT
Brittany Turner ✓ Verified
2 months ago
★★★★★
supreme Purchase Ever
After assorted use, the Vintage 1986 Designer Laurel Burch “Rainbow Cats” Cloisonné Enamel 18” Necklace works fine so no complaints.
JA
Joshua Allen ✓ Verified
4 weeks ago
★★★★★
extraordinary Quality
After certain use, it feels okay and it meets expectations.
AP
Adam Parker ✓ Verified
3 weeks ago
★★★★★
remarkable Quality
To be fair, it works fine which is good enough.